tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609536178570975752.post3563285406900228726..comments2024-01-12T00:32:20.149-08:00Comments on The Overhead Wire: Service Levels & IncomePantograph Trolleypolehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17833159138533550544noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609536178570975752.post-33745931798589123832009-03-17T13:58:00.000-07:002009-03-17T13:58:00.000-07:00I think it has less to do with transit, density, c...I think it has less to do with transit, density, crime, or anything and more to do with the fact that <I>The Examiner</I> is a rag that isn't worth the paper and ink required to print it.<BR/><BR/>Sorry to be so snarky, but <I>The Examiner</I> -- at least its D.C. edition -- really gets on my nerves, especially when it comes to how it rails against transit.<BR/><BR/>But, on a positive note, I guess it's good to have different points of view? Maybe???Dustin, New York Cityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12818757194703241935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609536178570975752.post-7500591699977818742009-03-17T07:27:00.000-07:002009-03-17T07:27:00.000-07:00"high-density areas, which invariably attract crim..."high-density areas, which invariably attract crime."<BR/><BR/>Huh? I'm no expert, but while high-density areas certainly sometimes have crime, it seems to me that well-designed high-density areas with a lot of foot traffic and "eyes on the street" are in fact much safer. Living in DC, I feel much more comfortable walking to a Metro station in a higher density area than one with very few people around.Carohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11741711852579058058noreply@blogger.com