Saturday, July 5, 2008

Tyson's Corner, Cars

An interesting article on Tyson's Corner from the Washington Post which is in the middle of a fight for a Metro extension. I don't know much about the area, but this article makes Mary Peters and Jim Simpson look ridiculous for trying to kill Metro. It doesn't say anything about it in the article, but this quote tells me a lot.
Tysons' dependence on the automobile, and a place to park it, is dramatic when compared with other areas. With about 120,000 jobs, Tysons features nearly half again as many parking spots in structures, underground and in surface lots. That's more parking, 40 million square feet, than office space, 28 million square feet. Tysons boasts more spaces, 167,000, than downtown Washington, 50,000, which has more than twice as many jobs.
More spaces than jobs? Who pays for all of those? And doesn't that number tell you something about the benefit of good transit? Yup.

6 comments:

Robert Cruickshank said...

In other words, that sort of urban design was a form of massive waste that was obscured by cheap oil. Without the cheap oil the scale of that waste is now finally being revealed.

jp said...

Tysons is designed as typical office park sprawl, its a high tech corridor, on of the big East coast ones. It can take you a 30 to drive a few miles on Route 50 during rush hour and the Capitol Beltway is crawl in that area constantly. They need Metro badly.

Winston said...

Given that Tysons Corner is the home to two enormous shopping malls (one of which was the world's largest when built) it isn't a big surprise that there are more parking spaces than jobs there.

The most striking thing about Tysons Corner when you're on the ground is that's both unusually dense for a suburban area of its type and its also unusually pedestrian unfriendly. If the Metro stations at Tysons ever get built (there are 4 planned) two of them would be in the least pedestrian friendly locations ever for a metro station. It would be interesting to see how metro affects this location which is already pretty densely built but pedestrian hostile vs. other station areas.

Kiran said...

I live down the street from Tyson's. Its pretty horrible. The last time I went there (January) I took the bus. It was faster. The bus drops you off right by the mall. Why should I drive , find a parking spot, and then walk to the mall. Its actually LESS walking to take public transit.

I think that the Metro should go to Tyson's have one or two stops past it, but NOT go to Dulles. In a world with $170+ a barrel jet fuel ($200 is coming) and $4.20+ a gallon gasoline, Dulles is not going to last. National and BWI have large populations within 25 miles of them in comparison. Lets spend those billions on improving metro inside the beltway, and building light rail to places that aren't horrid suburban sprawl.

Allen said...

Actually from looking online, the DC's downtown booster org says they only have 175,000 jobs downtown, not twice as many as TC like the article claims.

Look into it a bit further, which is more effecient, dwtwn DC having 3 times as much heater and air conditioned office space as Tysons Corner w/ only 50% more jobs OR a bunch of parking spots that aren't heated and cooled???

sex999 said...

A片,A片,情色,情色,A片,A片,情色,情色,A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖

美女交友,AIO交友愛情館,AIO,成人交友,視訊交友網,視訊交友,拓網交友,PC交友,視訊交友90739,交友,情色交友,聊天室交友,辣妹視訊,視訊辣妹,美女視訊,視訊美女,情色視訊,日本AV,免費視訊聊天,視訊聊天,AV女優,AV,視訊聊天室,視訊,免費視訊,情人視訊網,本土自拍,自拍,AVDVD,SEX,微風成人,微風論壇,微風成人區,成人網站,成人,成人電影,嘟嘟成人網,成人貼圖,成人影片,成人圖片區,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人影城,成人文章,成人論壇,愛情公寓,情色論壇,情色,色情聊天室,色情,情色貼圖,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,寄情築園小遊戲,色情遊戲,情色電影,情色網,做愛,UT聊天室,聊天室,聊天,哈拉聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,苗栗人聊天室,080中部人聊天室,080聊天室,中部人聊天室,柔情聊天網,6K聊天室,小高聊天室,上班族聊天室,免費A片,A片,成人聊天室,一夜情聊天室,情色聊天室,色色網,免費AV