This comes at the same time when Texas wants to use other stimulus funding for another sprawl road. Again, how would this ever match a cost-effectiveness measure?As county leaders press forward with Grand Parkway plans, Metro leaders are looking for a Plan B for two rail lines they had planned to use federal economic stimulus money to help fund. Metro’s pitch to fund the North and Southeast lines with stimulus funds fell short of the feds’ scheduling mandate.
Metro proposed to “get the ball rolling,” within 90 days, according to its brochure requesting $410 million in stimulus dollars. The transit agency also said $70 million could be used to convert 83 miles of high-occupancy vehicle lanes into high-occupancy toll lanes. Last week, Metro leaders said they learned that federal transit authorities preferred the $92 million it will receive in stimulus funds be used primarily on the HOV conversion.
Monday, March 23, 2009
HOT Lanes, Sprawl, Not Transit
So says the FTA about stimulus cash. What a joke. I sure hope things change soon because I'm getting tired of this type of BS. Is anyone else encouraged by the DOT Secretary's blog? I am.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
HOT lanes are not "fixed guideways". They are highways. The Grand Parkway is a bad proposal.
Did you expect anything different from Houston, TX, the capitol of sprawl?
Update: the FTA will fund part of the rail lines from stimulus after all.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6338715.html
Post a Comment